<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Inside Lightroom</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/atom.xml" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2007-12-06:/lightroom//33</id>
<updated>2009-01-25T03:14:28Z</updated>

<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>

<entry>
<title>Virtual Copies and the Develop Module in Lightroom</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/05/virtual-copies-and-the-develop.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.36174</id>

<published>2009-05-09T17:36:26Z</published>
<updated>2009-05-09T17:36:26Z</updated>

<summary>There is an interesting, but sometimes confusing, issue when you create a virtual copy while you are working in the Develop module. Here&apos;s the scenario: You are working on an image and before you travel down an alternate creative path you decide to make a virtual copy before proceeding. So you use the menu command or the keyboard shortcut and... poof ...a different image is sitting there instead of your virtual copy! You go back to the Library module or look in the filmstrip and notice your virtual copy did get created. You&apos;ve done this before and it worked. So what&apos;s going on?
</summary>
<author>
<name>Gene McCullagh</name>
<uri>http://lightroomsecrets.com</uri>
</author>

<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom2" label="lightroom2" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="photography" label="photography" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
There is an interesting, but sometimes confusing, issue when you create a virtual copy while you are working in the Develop module. Here&apos;s the scenario: You are working on an image and before you travel down an alternate creative path you decide to make a virtual copy before proceeding. So you use the menu command or the keyboard shortcut and... poof ...a different image is sitting there instead of your virtual copy! You go back to the Library module or look in the filmstrip and notice your virtual copy did get created. You&apos;ve done this before and it worked. So what&apos;s going on?
</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>Synchronizing two cameras in Lightroom</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/02/synchronizing-two-cameras-in-l.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35202</id>

<published>2009-02-04T20:42:19Z</published>
<updated>2009-02-04T20:42:19Z</updated>

<summary>Recently, I had some trouble synchronizing images shot from with three different digital cameras when I imported them into Lightroom. As it turned out one of my cameras was not set to the correct time or time zone and this...</summary>
<author>
<name>Michael Clark</name>

</author>

<category term="capturetimeimagessychronizingsync" label="capture time images sychronizing sync" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="photography" label="photography" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
Recently, I had some trouble synchronizing images shot from with three different digital cameras when I imported them into Lightroom. As it turned out one of my cameras was not set to the correct time or time zone and this...</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>A Refresher on Image Previews</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2009/01/a-refresher-on-image-previews.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2009:/lightroom//33.34996</id>

<published>2009-01-17T11:00:20Z</published>
<updated>2009-01-17T11:00:20Z</updated>

<summary>It&#8217;s easy to develop a routine of doing something the same way over and over again without considering how effective it is. Using Lightroom is definitely no exception. How you choose to handle initial previews has a direct impact on...</summary>
<author>
<name>Steve Paxton</name>
<uri>http://www.paxtonportraits.com/</uri>
</author>

<category term="11" label="1:1" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="import" label="import" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="minimal" label="minimal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="previews" label="previews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="sidecar" label="sidecar" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="standard" label="standard" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
It&#8217;s easy to develop a routine of doing something the same way over and over again without considering how effective it is. Using Lightroom is definitely no exception. How you choose to handle initial previews has a direct impact on...</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>What does an unprocessed image look like?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2009/01/what-does-an-unprocessed-image-look-like.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2009:/lightroom//33.34894</id>

<published>2009-01-09T11:00:00Z</published>
<updated>2009-01-09T11:00:00Z</updated>

<summary>Pop quiz: Which of these describes an unprocessed raw image?
1. The initial preview created by the camera, seen briefly in Lightroom
2. The initial preview generated by Lightroom
3. The state after applying the General - Zeroed Develop Preset
4. None of the above</summary>
<author>
<name>Mark Sirota</name>

</author>

<category term="defaults" label="defaults" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="raw" label="raw" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
Pop quiz: Which of these describes an unprocessed raw image?
1. The initial preview created by the camera, seen briefly in Lightroom
2. The initial preview generated by Lightroom
3. The state after applying the General - Zeroed Develop Preset
4. None of the above</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>My top ten wishes for Lightroom in 2009</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2009/01/my-top-ten-wishes-for-lightroo.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2009:/lightroom//33.34840</id>

<published>2009-01-07T14:59:00Z</published>
<updated>2009-01-07T14:59:00Z</updated>

<summary>I decided to compile a list of my wishes for where I&#8217;d like Lightroom to develop in the new year.</summary>
<author>
<name>Jao van de Lagemaat</name>

</author>

<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="wishlist" label="wishlist" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
I decided to compile a list of my wishes for where I&#8217;d like Lightroom to develop in the new year.</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>Lightroom&apos;s 16-bit Print the Holy Grail?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2009/01/lightroom-2s-16-bit-printing-t.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2009:/lightroom//33.34830</id>

<published>2009-01-02T20:03:55Z</published>
<updated>2009-01-02T20:03:55Z</updated>

<summary>The other day someone told me that Lightroom 2&apos;s 16-bit print capability is the holy grail of printing. Up to now I&apos;ve been perfectly happy with the standard 8-bit printing. But fearing I was missing out on something special I...</summary>
<author>
<name>Mikkel Aaland</name>

</author>

<category term="adobe" label="adobe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="printing" label="printing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
The other day someone told me that Lightroom 2&apos;s 16-bit print capability is the holy grail of printing. Up to now I&apos;ve been perfectly happy with the standard 8-bit printing. But fearing I was missing out on something special I...</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>Being There - The Joy of Outdoor Photography</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2008/12/the-joy-of-outdoor-photography.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2008:/lightroom//33.34726</id>

<published>2008-12-24T14:00:00Z</published>
<updated>2008-12-24T14:00:00Z</updated>

<summary>Often we can get too involved with the mechanics of photography and forget about the magic of just being there, seeing, and snapping pictures. </summary>
<author>
<name>Jao van de Lagemaat</name>

</author>

<category term="landscape" label="landscape" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="photography" label="photography" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
Often we can get too involved with the mechanics of photography and forget about the magic of just being there, seeing, and snapping pictures. </content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>Printing with Borders, Backgrounds and Overlays!</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2008/12/printing-with-boarder-backgrou.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2008:/lightroom//33.34765</id>

<published>2008-12-24T08:58:57Z</published>
<updated>2008-12-24T08:58:57Z</updated>

<summary>A quick Holiday Post, the time for shopping is getting short&#133; Recently a photographer switching to Lightroom [LR] asked if he could print on a black background with a white border as he did in Photoshop [PS]. Well, the answer...</summary>
<author>
<name>Bob DiNatale</name>
<uri>http://www.BobDiNatale.com</uri>
</author>

<category term="backgrounds" label="backgrounds" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="bobd" label="BobD" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="borders" label="borders" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="printing" label="printing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
A quick Holiday Post, the time for shopping is getting short&#133; Recently a photographer switching to Lightroom [LR] asked if he could print on a black background with a white border as he did in Photoshop [PS]. Well, the answer...</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>Bug Reports and Feature Requests</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2008/12/bug-reports-and-feature-reques.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2008:/lightroom//33.34656</id>

<published>2008-12-23T11:00:00Z</published>
<updated>2008-12-23T11:00:00Z</updated>

<summary>Adobe first released Lightroom in 2006 as a public beta, asking photographers to participate in the design through the associated discussion forum.  While that forum is now closed, the opportunity to influence the direction of Lightroom still exists.</summary>
<author>
<name>Mark Sirota</name>

</author>

<category term="adobe" label="adobe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="bugreport" label="bug report" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="features" label="features" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="feedback" label="feedback" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="wishlist" label="wishlist" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
Adobe first released Lightroom in 2006 as a public beta, asking photographers to participate in the design through the associated discussion forum.  While that forum is now closed, the opportunity to influence the direction of Lightroom still exists.</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>Lightroom Tip O&apos; the Week</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2008/12/stacks-are-pretty-cool.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2008:/lightroom//33.34696</id>

<published>2008-12-18T12:53:08Z</published>
<updated>2008-12-18T12:53:08Z</updated>

<summary>Stacks are pretty cool &#133; I use them quite a bit while I shuffle around images in Library mode. There&#8217;s a very nice shortcut for creating and collapsing stacks that I&#8217;m totally digging lately &#133; it&#8217;s ultra-simple: Select the images...</summary>
<author>
<name>Brandon Oelling</name>
<uri>http://x-equals.com/blog/</uri>
</author>

<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="shortcuts" label="shortcuts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="tips" label="tips" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="workflow" label="workflow" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
Stacks are pretty cool &#133; I use them quite a bit while I shuffle around images in Library mode. There&#8217;s a very nice shortcut for creating and collapsing stacks that I&#8217;m totally digging lately &#133; it&#8217;s ultra-simple: Select the images...</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>Why I gave up Photoshop</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2008/12/why-i-gave-up-photoshop.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2008:/lightroom//33.34602</id>

<published>2008-12-16T11:00:00Z</published>
<updated>2008-12-16T11:00:00Z</updated>

<summary>When bought my first digital SLR in April 2006, moving from scanned film, I gave up Photoshop completely.  Quit cold turkey.

At that time Lightroom was at public beta #2, and it certainly wasn&apos;t capable of doing everything Photoshop could (and still isn&apos;t).  But even then there was considerable overlap in their capabilities, and rather than allowing myself to fall back on what I knew, I forced myself to learn the new ways of thinking.</summary>
<author>
<name>Mark Sirota</name>

</author>

<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="photoshop" label="photoshop" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
When bought my first digital SLR in April 2006, moving from scanned film, I gave up Photoshop completely.  Quit cold turkey.

At that time Lightroom was at public beta #2, and it certainly wasn&apos;t capable of doing everything Photoshop could (and still isn&apos;t).  But even then there was considerable overlap in their capabilities, and rather than allowing myself to fall back on what I knew, I forced myself to learn the new ways of thinking.</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>Importing Photoshop Files:  Maximize Compatibility Issue</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2008/12/importing-photoshop-files----m.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2008:/lightroom//33.34600</id>

<published>2008-12-15T03:11:04Z</published>
<updated>2008-12-15T03:11:04Z</updated>

<summary>A few years ago I made a decision in Photoshop that is affecting me greatly today. I chose to save my Photoshop (PSD) files with Maximize Compatibility (MC) turned off. MC saves a flattened version of your file along with...</summary>
<author>
<name>Laura Shoe</name>

</author>

<category term="action" label="action" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="batchprocessing" label="batch processing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="compatibility" label="compatibility" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="photoshop" label="photoshop" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="workflow" label="workflow" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
A few years ago I made a decision in Photoshop that is affecting me greatly today. I chose to save my Photoshop (PSD) files with Maximize Compatibility (MC) turned off. MC saves a flattened version of your file along with...</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>Lightroom Tip O&apos; the Week</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2008/12/lightroom-tip-o-the-week-2.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2008:/lightroom//33.34590</id>

<published>2008-12-11T14:00:00Z</published>
<updated>2008-12-11T14:00:00Z</updated>

<summary> This weeks tip has been around since version 1.0 of Lightroom, and although I personally do not use it that often, it&#8217;s a great image inspection technique. Normally, I&#8217;m pushing images to 72ppi for proofing on the web, which...</summary>
<author>
<name>Brandon Oelling</name>
<uri>http://x-equals.com/blog/</uri>
</author>

<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="shortcuts" label="shortcuts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="tips" label="tips" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="workflow" label="workflow" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
 This weeks tip has been around since version 1.0 of Lightroom, and although I personally do not use it that often, it&#8217;s a great image inspection technique. Normally, I&#8217;m pushing images to 72ppi for proofing on the web, which...</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>Lightroom Export Plug-in for Photomatix</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2008/12/lightroom-export-plug-in-for-p.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2008:/lightroom//33.34523</id>

<published>2008-12-10T19:01:36Z</published>
<updated>2008-12-10T19:01:36Z</updated>

<summary>One of my favorite programs for creating HDR images is Photomatix. Until just recently, there wasn&apos;t an easy way for Lightroom users to jump directly into Photomatix. In October, HDRsoft solved this problem by releasing a brand new plug-in that allows you to open images in Photomatix directly from Lightroom. Here&apos;s how it works.</summary>
<author>
<name>Steve Paxton</name>
<uri>http://www.paxtonportraits.com/</uri>
</author>

<category term="hdr" label="hdr" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="photomatix" label="photomatix" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
One of my favorite programs for creating HDR images is Photomatix. Until just recently, there wasn&apos;t an easy way for Lightroom users to jump directly into Photomatix. In October, HDRsoft solved this problem by releasing a brand new plug-in that allows you to open images in Photomatix directly from Lightroom. Here&apos;s how it works.</content>

</entry>

<entry>
<title>High resolution landscapes with a low-resolution DSLR - the cheapskate/lazyman&apos;s solution</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/2008/12/high-resolution-landscapes-wit.html" />
<id>tag:blogs.oreilly.com,2008:/lightroom//33.34513</id>

<published>2008-12-09T17:54:52Z</published>
<updated>2008-12-09T17:54:52Z</updated>

<summary>So how does one make a 20+ MP camera from a 6MP one? The answer is panoramic stitching of multiple images...</summary>
<author>
<name>Jao van de Lagemaat</name>

</author>

<category term="landscape" label="landscape" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="lightroom" label="lightroom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="panorama" label="panorama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="resolution" label="resolution" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.oreilly.com/lightroom/">
So how does one make a 20+ MP camera from a 6MP one? The answer is panoramic stitching of multiple images...</content>

</entry>

</feed>