Digital Media | Spotlight: Photography | Inside Lightroom | Blogs
Adobe Lightroom 2 Beta vs. Nikon Capture NX 2
This has been kind of a trying week for me, I am in the middle of moving house, so my time is very limited and I am still trying to get the telephone (and ADSL) installed at the new house. At the same time the license for my review copy of Lightroom expired this week (which caused both my copy of Lightroom 1 and Lightroom 2 Beta to stop working) and it took me a few days to find the serial number for my personal copy, mainly because it was already packed for the move. I did finally find it though and am now back in business.
The biggest thing to happen in the Nikon photography world this past week, was the release of Nikon Capture NX2. Nikon has taken the somewhat unusual approach of offering current licensed Capture NX users a FREE pass for two months, while giving new users only a week to buy a license. There is some controversy concerning the rather steep upgrade price of approximately $100 (compared to the full price of approximately $150), especially after the recent FREE Capture NX software offering for Nikon D300 purchasers, but it is an important software package for Nikon D SLR users and in comparison to the price of the higher end Nikon cameras, is not really all that unreasonable.
Capture NX 2 and Lightroom 2 Beta Interface Comparison
I am not really trying to compare the image quality of the two applications in this post but rather the interface itself. The two images below are the Edit Workspace in Capture NX 2 and the Develop Module in Lightroom 2 Beta. Obviously Nikon is aware that the Module interface of Lightroom is a big success and they are trying to achieve something similar (without infringing on any patents). If the interface does not look that much different from the last Capture NX interface to you, there are now four basic Capture NX Workspaces (Browser, Meta-Data, Multi-Purpose, and Edit) and a second monitor option for the image viewing window. It was possible to arrange the windows to your individual preference before, but now you can access different "workspaces" instantly and configure your own custom workspaces. It is not really a revolutionary re-design of the interface but it does make it a lot easier and quicker to work with the Capture NX software.
Nikon Capture NX 2 - The default image, plus D-Lighting for the deep shadows at the back of the spirit house. D-Lighting automatically boosts the shadows and color so it comes out quite a bit brighter than the basic Lightroom setting. Notice that the folders and Image browser are collapsed to the left.
Adobe Lightroom 2 Beta - The default image plus a Fill Light adjustment setting of 35. I could have brought this image a little closer to the Lightroom image by boosting the Vibrance and saturation. The collapsed pallets (left and bottom) in Lightroom are not visible but can be easily re-activated by passing over them with the mouse.

Awesome, I was planning on writing something like this, looks like I don’t need to! Play games
Thanks for this.
I wonder where I, a DSLR novice, could go to get my arms around the issue of whether to use Capture NX2 or Adobe Lightroom 2 or even Photoshop CS3? I use a Nikon D40 and am starting to use the Nikon RAW format (NEF).
I need clarity so any help is gratefully received. I have a family website which I built with Dreamweaver CS3 (which I took tutorials on) and will have PS anyway. But if it is overkill and the Lightroom or Capture NX2 is better -- and maybe more idiot-proof (I'm the idiot) -- then please tell me.
Thanks!
Well, I was looking for an image program for work and tried out a couple, including lightroom and nx2. But out of those, I still found the Adobe Lightroom to be better. But that's just me, it might be because I use the rest of the Adobe Masters Suite at work and prefer the Adobe interfaces more. And not to forget that Lightroom has the cooler UI of the 2 (see screenshots above).
earth4energy
I still think Adobe Lightroom is alot better than nx2..
Earth4Energy
I agree Adobe lightroom is better than nx2 it is alot easier to use the interface is very user-friendly.
Thats excellent!
Someone may argue why we need Lightroom while we got photoshop. Well, after careful usage of LR2 I can definitely say a big yes. It is so much faster to do essential touchup work on LR2. I got so used to LR2 that I don't even want to look into NX2 as long as it supports raw files.
Adobe Lightroom for the win in this case.
wotlk leveling guide
in this case Lightroom is my winner.
Adobe Lightroom is much better than nikon capture. problem solved. -earth4energy
I wonder where I, a DSLR novice, could go to get my arms around the issue of whether to use Capture NX2 or Adobe Lightroom 2 or even Photoshop CS3? I use a Nikon D40 and am starting to use the Nikon RAW format (NEF). - acne treatment systems
I need clarity so any help is gratefully received. I have a family website which I built with Dreamweaver CS3 (which I took tutorials on) and will have PS anyway. But if it is overkill and the Lightroom or Capture NX2 is better -- and maybe more idiot-proof (I'm the idiot) -- then please tell me. - best acne solution
To be really honest, i still think adobe as better product compared to NX2.
Earth4Energy Scam
I think Adobe Lightroom 2 is much better than Nikon Capture NX 2.
I do agree with you'all about easier control (and faster) with LR, but recent project got me thinking about tethered shooting!
it is becoming essential to be able to shoot right into LR.
is it possible to shoot into LR with nikon D-200?
Hey just stumbled upon this blog post..Great blog you have just subscribed to your list. :)
Please check out mine --
Earth 4 Energy
Evelina
It looks as though the 2 applications have very similar interfaces.