Digital Media | Spotlight: Photography | Inside Lightroom | Blogs
A Master Catalog Idea
As professional photographers who are always in need of a good cataloging and archival strategy - we continually strive for one setup that is scalable and would work for our needs. And I think, speaking for many, we would love if that setup involved only one piece of software. And if we could fit that archive onto a single external hard drive and take it on the road with us just in case a client needs an image that would be even better. I was never thrilled with iView Media Pro (now Expression Media) or Extensis Portfolio. They worked but I always felt that a better option would present itself sooner rather than later and I was and still am hoping that Lightroom can step in and take over.
Hence, while talking with a peer this past week about cataloging and archiving images, it dawned on me that most professional photographers don't need - or even want an archive of every single image they've ever shot. What I need (speaking only for myself now) is an archive of my best and sellable images - i.e. my master images. The idea was to put all of my select digital images and film scans into one Lightroom catalog. And since all of my selects are completely worked up as tiffs I can save them as jpegs with the least amount of compression (saved at a compression ratio of 12 in Photoshop) and then import them into Lightroom. This gives me full resolution images for submissions and for delivering the high resolution versions to clients.
I realize jpeg versions of the high resolution images is not the highest quality format but for most of my clients the difference between a full resolution tiff file and a high quality jpeg file (if it was only saved once) is very small. In fact, most every stock agency around these days delivers high quality jpegs to their clients, not tiff files.
And with all of those images keyworded and with full metadata I have a mobile office ready to submit images and deliver the final product. The Library module with it's extensive search functions will aid in selecting images for submissions (especially Lightroom 2 Beta with it's very advanced search options). I can save those selections of images as a collection and then I can use Lightroom's web galleries to build the actual submissions. And finally, by saving the images as jpegs I can fit a very large number of images on a portable external hard drive - 10,000 to 20,000 images is not an issue at all. Even with that many images in Lightroom, since they are jpegs, the program should be able to operate at very tolerable speeds.
All in all it works quite well and as Lightroom becomes a cataloging and archiving software - as it surely will - adding more images won't be an issue. Or at least that is the hope.
That's it for this session. See you next week.
Adios, Michael
Comments (8)


Michael,
Here's a somewhat different, but related question.
I've been working with both LR 1.4.1 and LR 2.0 recently. I'm aware that there's no guarantee that the LR 2.0 beta catalog will be compatible with the LR 2.0 final release, so I've been following their instructions to import copies of my images and to make sure to store them elsewhere (in my case, 1.4.1's catalog).
However, the problem is that I tend to process a lot of images in LR 2.0 because of it's great new features. So then I end up with processed images in 2.0 that I then have to export as DNG, JPG or TIFF and re-import into 1.4.1 to make sure I have a copy that will be in the 1.4.1 catalog when it comes time to upgrade to 2.0 final.
This is obviously a very cumbersome working method, so I'm wondering if you've figured out a better way to approach working in 1.4 and 2.0 simultaneously.
Chris -
I don't work up my images in 2.0 beta at all unless I am playing around with the controls to figure it out. There isn't really a workaround.
I sure hope LR2 beta catalogs are upgradeable to the final version. If not Adobe's going to have a mess on their hands. A ton of photographers (including myself) are doing all their current shoots exclusively in LRB2.
As to the size and amount of files in our catalogs. I see no need to only archive JPEGs. Storage is cheap, and it growing exponentially with the size of our image libraries.
Gav
Well, the download notes on Beta 2 said specifically that the catalogs would not be upgradeable and those notes seem to be reliable in my experience - so be careful. I understand the need to use the beta - it is sweet.
And on the size and amount of files in Lightroom - I had run tests showing that more than 15,000 images radically slowed down Lightroom (version 1.3). Whether or not this is the case with Lightroom 2 when it comes out is yet to be determined. It isn't a matter of storage space but rather an issue of Lightroom dealing with 20,000 + images in a single catalog and still running at an effective speed.
Michael, you're wrong about the LR2 Beta catalogues not being upgradeable. The beta will not upgrade LR1 catalogues, but Tom Hogarty said at http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/04/lightroom_2_beta_available.html "Lightroom 1.x and 2.0 beta libraries will be migrated to the finished version of Lightroom 2.0." He adds "Develop settings applied in Lightroom 2.0 beta are not guaranteed to transfer correctly to the final version of 2.0. This is particularly true for localized corrections."
John
Glad to hear that Lightroom 2 Beta will be upgradeable - but honestly if the develop settings don't transfer then it isn't fully "upgradeable" and that would be a sad day for many I am sure. We'll know soon enough...
Never heard of the expression "wiggle room"?
Great article. Gives me many good ideas, thanks. Downloadable mobile games