I've been cheerleading for iPhone tethering since this past summer. In spite of that AT&T and Apple have failed to announce it. With Macworld Expo 2009 almost over, I'm beginning to wonder if Apple considers this feature a maybe-someday feature rather than a priority.
I'm picking up on a line of thought from Macworld Podcast 143. Someone on the panel pointed out that, due to spectacular growth in market share, the average Mac user is not really a veteran with five or more years experience on the platform. If that is the case, there's less in the way of awareness of technologies like the Snow Leopard release of Mac OS X. Otherwise, why would Apple be selling the Mac Box Set consisting of iLife '09, iWork '09, and Leopard?
Of course the new versions of iLife and iWork require Leopard, but selling the three as an ensemble strongly suggests that Leopard will be around for some time to come.
Technophiles like us generally know why Snow Leopard is important to the future of the Mac platform even if we don't want to pay for it. Mac users like my wife-- who is much smarter than me but isn't up on every feature of OS X 10.5-- don't know what Snow Leopard is or does.
Many of the same principles may hold for the iPhone feature set, with tethering being a good example of a feature that is of limited significance. Lack of tethering support has not stopped untold numbers of people worldwide from purchasing iPhones. Tethering is an important feature to long distance commuters and technology pundits filling out smartphone comparison charts. But it's not a big deal to most iPhone users.
So will tethering ever happen officially? It seems like a no-brainer; It's a big potential source of incremental revenue for AT&T. But I became pessimistic today for the first time in a while.
I know that I won't be satisfied with tethering implemented as a third-party app. And if it has to be embedded in the iPhone 3G firmware deep enough that it can run in the background of a non-jailbroken handset, we're talking about a major firmware release.
Tethering is a niche need with a much smaller constituency than Microsoft Exchange support. And if we're looking for "gee wiz" features to be added to the iPhone, they'll probably be things that the a large percentage of iPhone users will at least try.
That's why I think that features like tethering are significantly lower on Apple's priority list than on AT&T's. That's also why I think the iPhone feature set will continue to focus on technologies that typical iPhone customers will understand and use.
I'm somewhat sad to conclude that people like us probably aren't the target market for the iPhone anymore. There are a lot more people who just want the iPhone because it makes them more productive than they are with any other smartphone.
Maybe that's why Apple will make us a bigger, more sophisticated iPhone-like device someday. I hope so.
This is the same situation with the app store. It's sad but true. iPhone/iPod touch is all about the younger demographic. If you plot the numger of games/toys on the Top 100 for the past 6 months you will see a steady increase. The platform right now is completely catered to gimmicks and hype-apps.
You are paritally right. You are not the main iPhone demographic. But you never were the main iPhone target demographic. Unlike most next-generation high tech products, the iPhone did not go through an early-adopter phase. The iPhone was ready for unsophisticated users and a broad customer demographic from its initial release. (This is one of the platform's major breakthroughs.)
Even though the iPhone customer-base is broad, Apple knows it is made up of many different demographics with different needs. Apple knows the importance of influencers (people who would normally be early-adopters). And Apple knows they can't lose the support of that critical demographic or allow them to jump ship to other compelling products such as Android or Palm Pre smartphones.
As someone who prays for iPhone tethering, I think you've slightly misidentified your demographic too. In addition to requiring technically sophisticated users, Tethering is a feature that is primarily of interest to cost-conscious customers who don't really have a mission critical need. After all, if cost or need was not an issue, you'd giving up praying that Steve and AT&T are listening and just get a cellular modem for your laptop. Problems solved for $60/month.
Hopefully strong competing products like Android and Pre will force Apple to remain competitive and provide features that hold the allegiance of cost-conscious, tech savvy customers like you.
iWork '09 doesn't require Leopard. (min. spec is 10.4.11)
Considering the iPhone's consumer bent (and it's email and web abilities), I'm not sure what advantage tethering would offer.
Your observation is right in one way, because always with the introduction with any product many people prefer to buy it on the introduction itself, like IP PBX when launched had a great selling, mostly they would be people who loves testing many products that are good for them in some way or the other,but as the product become popular the first section that goes into these types of products are the youngsters, and for them the main applications would be related with games and other sorts of things which fancy them. The same case is being applied here too, this would reduce the use of developers who use the product for many other purpose. For apple its a good move it increases the sales and thereby give them good profit they can also give some Online Promotional Code which would help them with the sales.