Search
Recommended for You

The wonderful world of appvertising


There’s a trend emerging on the App Store - applications that are really adverts. I call them “appverts”.

The first one I noticed was iPint, created by Molson Coors (and now embroiled in a lawsuit with the owners of iPint’s predecessor, iBeer; but that’s another story in itself).

And then there’s the James Bond 007, which according to reviews from App Store users is little more than a trailer for the new Bond movie, Quantum of Solace. Something you could view very easily at Apple’s trailers site or on YouTube or a dozen other places. It hardly qualifies as an “application”, and the official app description tells you nothing except for the movie plot.

One comment by Sindomian summed it up: “Promotional garbage dressed up as an app … the App Store is going to get pretty unusable real quick if this catches on.”

But will it? Who benefits from appverts?

The marketing people behind this were no doubt delighted when their app was approved to appear on the Store, but surely that sets a precedent, and now all movie producers will be wanting to do the same thing. Will Apple approve them all? And what’s more, does it really achieve much for the marketers? The iPhone has sold well, but not so well that an entry in the App Store is going to deliver thousands of extra box office tickets. From that point of view, it seems like a very expensive gimmick.

The consumers don’t seem terribly interested, either. The comments on the 007 app are almost all negative, but not, it seems because the app is an appvert; mainly, it’s because it’s a bad appvert. It doesn’t deliver much. Perhaps if it offered more, people would be more willing to give it higher ratings.

And the developers. What’s in appverts for developers? Well, probably some good money. And no need to wait for punters to buy; the dev gets paid up front by the marketing team. Building any app adds experience, so it’s beneficial from that point of view too.

But how would you feel about building an appvert? Do you think it’s OK for the App Store to host apps like this, and would you be happy to build one if asked?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Comments (4)

4 Comments

Anonymous said:

KickScreen Movie Trailers offer a wonderful way to view movie trailers/synopsis on the iPhone.

Appverts are bad for the AppStore but great for developers.

Justin Noel said:

As a member of a company developing an app tracking service, I see this as just more "fluff" apps to sift through. The App Store in iTunes just isn't very well suited for this.

Hopefully, our site (http://appbeacon.com) and other similar app tracking services will make this easier for iPhone / iPod touch users.

James Moore said:

Of course this is OK.

The app store is going to have hundreds of thousands (or even millions) of apps. The thought that people are going to browse through them is laugh-out-loud funny.

Worst case is that Apple takes this sort of thing seriously and starts to filter apps based on what they do. Is the New York Times app just an ad?

juandesant said:

The iTunes Store + Safari touch has an additional card up their sleeve: external sites can rank the applications, with links opening the App Store right on the selected application, so there can be more value in those sites than just pointing to applications by name.

However, better navigation is needed in the App Store, both in iTunes and the portable devices.

ps. I know this works in the Mac with Safari + iTunes, and I would expect it to work in the same way for iPod touch/iPhone; I just don't have one to play with ;-)

Leave a comment