Digital Media Photography Blogs > Photography

High Focal Range (HFR)


If you've ever looked closely at a daffodil like this beautiful specimen, you'll know that within the outer yellow petals is an orange "trumpet" (sometimes the trumpet is yellow like the outer petals of the flower, not orange). The trumpet itself contains the reproductive parts of the flower: ovaries, pistil, and the stigma, style, and anthers shown in my photo below. You'll know, from having observed the daffodil, that these reproductive parts are really, really tiny.

Daffodil


Daffodil, photo by Harold Davis. View this image larger.

So tiny that when I photographed this flower indoors (to control wind) backlit with the bright light of the morning sun in our breakfast nook, I found I could not get both the style (which sticks out a bit) and the anthers (the things covered with pollen) in focus.

The solution is to extend the field of focus by taking multiple photographs, each with a different point of focus. Provided you use the same aperture in each exposure, it can be possible to combine the two images as layers in Photoshop, thus extending the field of focus. In this case, I took two captures, one focused on the style and one focused on the anthers.

This process is sometimes called focus "stacking". But I figure, why not give it a high-fallutin descriptive term and acronym? Extending the dynamic, or exposure, range of an photo using multiple captures creates a High Dynamic Range (HDR) image. So why shouldn't extending a photo's focal range by stacking several captures create a High Focal Range (HFR) image? You heard it from me first...

[Nikon D300, 200mm f/4 macro lens (300mm in 35mm terms), 36mm extension tube, +4 diopter close up filter, two exposures with different focal points, both at 1.6 seconds and f/36, ISO 100, tripod mounted.]

Categories





AddThis Social Bookmark Button



Comments (4)
Read More Entries by Harold Davis.

4 Comments

Stephen said:

Actually, I heard it somewhere else first. The preferred term seems to be Extended Depth of Field (EDF). I saw it on some site a couple months ago. I haven't tried it yet, but it seems like a cool idea. A quick search turns up:

http://www.janrik.net/ptools/ExtendedFocusPano12/index.html
http://www.wonderfulphotos.com/articles/macro/focus_stacking/
http://bigwww.epfl.ch/demo/edf/

JimmyD said:

Wow, now it's "HFR" (I heard it here first!)? It used to be pretty simple doing it crudely in Photoshop, but now that it's got an official acronym, I'll have to be afraid of it.
Wonder when all the HFR-Ready tripods and Compact-Flash cards will be introduced? You know, it can't be done without the proper tools! :)

Harold Davis said:

George, I did it the old-fashioned way , by hand masking layers in Photoshop. But in this case it was pretty easy because the layers went together so well, the closest focus area fit right on top in perfect alignment. Thanks - Harold

George said:

Harold,

Magnificent shot!!! How did you blend the three images together...with a mask or do you use specific software to do this?

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Topics of Interest

Related Books

Archives


 
 


Or, visit our complete archive.  

Stay Connected