Making Cheaper Movies
For a while now, I've been watching from my editor's desk about the
convergence between film and digital moviemaking. And if you're like
me, you probably didn't see many movies in the theatres this summer
that made you stand up and say, "Wow! That was a solid movie!"
Well, neither did Hollywood--except they're referring to the
bottom-lines at the box office. So here's an innovative way for
Hollywood to cut costs in making theatrical releases: give college
students a million dollars, have them develop a script (maybe), edit it
together, put in some FX, and stick it in a theatre near you. See this
article in the Austin American-Statesman newspaper for more details.
Curtain Rises on UT Film Institute
This is interesting for at least three reasons:
- It will be entirely digital productions, hence an increase in the
amount of people learning affordable PC and Mac production tools such
as Final Cut Pro, After Effects, Premiere, Audition, etc. - It's blessed and funded by Holywood studios with plenty of big
wigs to ensure that distribution actually happens into major theatres
(UA, Cinemark, General Cinema, etc.) - The test bed is happening right here in Austin-- my own back yard!
As I mentioned, this isn't an entirely unexpected move, given how many
underperforming big-budget movies there were this summer. Many of them
were good, but their budgets were too high, and only some squeaked out
with a small profit domestically (numbers courtesy of imdb.com).
For example:
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Budget: 170 million Gross: 148.4 million (8/24)
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life
Budget: 90 million Gross: 62 million (8/24)
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
Budget: 78 million Gross: 64 million (8/24)
Hulk
Budget: 120 million Gross: 131 million (8/24)
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
Budget: 120 million Gross: 99 million (8/24)
Seabiscuit
Budget: 86 million Gross: 92 million (8/24)
S.W.A.T
Budget: 80 million Gross: 82.8 million (8/24)
Bad Boys II
Budget: 130 million Gross: 132 million (8/24)
And this summer's favorite whipping boy...
Gigli
Budget: 54 million Gross: 5 million (8/10; removed
from theatres)
Only a few clear big-budget winners this summer:
X2: X-Men United
Budget: 110 million Gross: 214 million (8/24)
Finding Nemo
Budget: 94 million Gross: 329 million (8/24) (Highest
summer movie)
Pirates of the Carribean: Curse of the Black Pearl
Budget: 125 million Gross: 281.3 million (9/7)
And then there's this movie, shot with the same prosumer camcorder that
I have, the Canon XL1s, and blown up to 35mm film from miniDV (720 x
480):
28 Days Later...
Budget: 9 million* Gross (USA): 43.5 million (8/24)
* Distributed in the US under "Fox Searchlight",
which helped finance the film.
So, when you look at the fact that this amateur movie grossed 43.5
million dollars for Fox, the ideas in the article above makes more
sense. Or cents. Take your pick.
Don't shelve that prosumer camcorder just yet....
Comments (1)
Read More Entries by Robert Eckstein.

Proxying a Reader Comment
I received a reply this morning (then accidently deleted it) from a gentleman who took issue with me dubbing "28 Days Later..." as an amateur film, citing that its budget was far more than the 3.5 million used for another popular film, "The Full Monty."
Granted. Perhaps amateur is not the correct terminiology-- "independent" may a better choice to describe Danny Boyle's film. In any case, it's still gratifying to see that such a popular film can be made with the help of a $3000 prosumer camcorder instead of lugging around huge Panavision 35mm cameras with anamorphic lenses.
Since the commenting feature was not turned on (my fault), I went ahead and posted this comment on his behalf.
-- Robert Eckstein