Inside Aperture

Digital Media | Spotlight: Photography | Inside Aperture | Blogs

Optimizing an Image, Take 2


A little while ago, Angel Island, an island in the middle of the San Francisco bay, caught fire. It started at about 9:30 and burned through the next day. I found out about it around 11pm, and it seemed like a great opportunity to go shoot something unusual! Shooting-wise, there were a few challenges, but I knew I could use Aperture to get the result I wanted. Specifically, I knew that noise could be a factor with higher ISOs, and I wanted to pick an exposure that would provide a good balance between providing detail and color in the fire plus detail in the rest of the scene.

Initially, I decided to shoot at ISO 200 on my 1Ds MkIII to minimize the noise. I was a little worried that the long exposure would cause the smoke from the fire to be really dispersed, but I figured that it was burning intensely enough that it wouldn't be an issue and could potentially give me a really big, glowing cloud in the image.

I decided that I wanted to end up with an image compensated down about 2/3 - 1 stop, but I instead dialed -1/3 stop into my camera. By shooting lighter, I knew that I would dial negative exposure compensation into Aperture and that would hopefully crush any noise in the dark areas. Plus, I figured that the bright white areas would burn out roughly the same amount unless I went down to at least -2.

before.jpg

Once I downloaded my card to Aperture, I picked the before image you see on the right. This shot was sharp, had a nice composition on the fire and smoke, and I like how the Berkeley Marina provided some perspective to the image. The shot was a little murky from all the smoke in the air, and the first thing I did was to figure out the exposure and black level that I wanted. I went with my initial thought about the exposure and dialed in -.4 stops, and then I slid the Black Point slider around until I found a value (7.47 if you care) that made the sky dark but not black. I then played around with the exposure slider, but found that my initial instinct was pretty good.

Next, I wanted to saturate the oranges and reds just a tad more. Because those colors are similar to skin tones, Vibrancy wouldn't have much effect. I clicked the right arrow on the saturation slider once, and found that a 1.1 value was too saturated and looked unnatural. I double-clicked on the field instead and entered a value of 1.04 (I wanted a tad less than half the effect 1.1 gave me), and that gave me the look I wanted. If I had really wanted to be precise about only saturating the reds and oranges, I could have used the color block and tweaked individual colors, but I was satisfied with saturating the overall image just a tad more.

after.jpg

Now that I had the look I wanted, I straightened my image and cropped it slightly (if I was going to crop a lot off, I would've done this step first). The last remaining challenge was the streak of lights from one of the helicopters circling the area. In Aperture 1.X, I would've gone into Photoshop at this point, but the Retouch brush in Aperture 2 is good enough that I didn't need Photoshop here. I zoomed in, and set the Retouch brush to automatically choose its source. With two large brush strokes, I had painted over the lights, and Aperture cleanly removed them.

With 5 minutes of work, I ended up with the after image you see here. I'm definitely happy with it!





AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Comments (5)

5 Comments

Nick said:

"ISO 200 on my 1Ds MkIII to minimize the noise". Noise, what`s noise? Oh I remember, its what Canon users have - isn`t it?

Cheers.

Nick
(D3/D700)

mauro Moroni said:

hehehe!
Nick, you've a Nikon, you cannot pretend to have everything!
:-))

Mauro
(D700/D300)

Mark Thomas said:

The new Nikons are amazing. But it was only a few years ago that Nikon users were insisting that noise was an advantage because it was more "film-like." And it was only a few months ago that they were busy deriding full frame. People!

David Medina said:

I am nikon user. I do not have the honor to work with a D700 or D3 yet, but noise can be my friend in some instances and I could still care less for full frame. I will buy a D700 soon just for the increase in ISo sensibility as well as better noise ratio.

But poor Canon users, Their hype house of card came down when the D3 came out lol


Josh Anon said:

Yes, David, I feel my house of cards crumbling every time I look at my full-frame, 22MP images. FYI, even if I were shooting this with a D3, I would've taken the same approach--shooting it a tad lighter and then dropping the exposure in Aperture. Given so much of this image is very dark, I want to minimize noise however I can.

Leave a comment


Recommended for You

Tag Cloud

Stay Connected