Inside Aperture

Digital Media | Spotlight: Photography | Inside Aperture | Blogs

The unification of images into Aperture


Last week, I finally gave up on a long-time personal policy that neatly divided my entire collection of images between professional photographs and personal pictures, between Aperture and iPhoto.

I've decided to move everything and merge my entire collection into a single place: Aperture.

It was not an easy decision to make. But after thinking about it for some time, and weighing the pros and cons, I finally decided that it is the best thing to do. As an independent photographer, I want to see everything in a single interface.

Since Aperture came out, I somehow got this idea of using it exclusively for my professional photography. I therefore continued using iPhoto for my personal pictures. And for a very long time, the separation was neat, simple, and practical.

Until, I started coming up with images that seems to defy my idea of Aperture and iPhoto separation and categorization. And through the years, I also somehow picked up the habit of preferring to use Aperture's tools more and more, even for my personal photos.

What I would do is to bring up the iPhoto browser in Aperture. At first, it was just a few images every now and then until it became somewhat the norm, specially because I've been using many different cameras (including the iPhone's camera). This practice turned out to be habitual that the distinct line of separation became a blur. In other words, I ended up with a big mess. And so, tired and confused, I thought long and hard, and that's when I finally decided to migrate all iPhoto images into my main Aperture library, with the actual images stored in, and referenced from, several external drives.

Making the decision to bring both professional and personal images together under Aperture wasn't easy. For one thing, I knew I was going to give up some of the functionalities that I have come to like in iPhoto. The idea of bringing everything together under a "single roof" may not even be the best thing for a lot of photographers. But it made sense to me. The main reason why I decided to do this is because I've come to always use Aperture anyway, even when the pictures are stored in iPhoto's library. And to keep everything organized, I need to deal only with a single library.

Since I have so many images in iPhoto that spanned years, the migration took some time. It afforded me a long nap. Thankfully, and because of its seamless integration with Aperture, I didn't encounter any major problem. And except for slideshows, books and Smart Albums (which wasn't really a big deal to me, but which may be for others), everything is now in Aperture the way it was organized in iPhoto. In a single interface, with every image within easy reach, I feel I am now able to better manage both my current professional and personal photographs, and even every other types of pictures that may fall in between.

Aperture's flexible Projects management made organizing the unification of images very easy. Capitalizing on this strength, with Projects and Albums, I was able to quickly put everything in order, in exactly the way I wanted, and on top of the already existing order and arrangements from iPhoto. If in case I need to tweak the organization some more, which I am sure I'll eventually do, it's comforting to know that I can easily do it. Two other tools helped me organize the images: Keywords and Metadata. I relied heavily on keywords and metadata to group collections into Smart Albums. This way of organizing was very helpful, and as a bonus, it gave me a fresh perspective into my current collection.

Now, this is not to say that I'm saying goodbye to iPhoto for good. Actually, I'm not ready to totally give up on iPhoto. It's just empty right now. I have a feeling that I will be using iPhoto again, and probably sooner than expected, for things that I may not be able to do in Aperture. When that time comes, and because of the tight integration between Aperture and iPhoto, I know that I can browse the Aperture library from within iPhoto, and do what I have to do there.





AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Comments (7)

7 Comments

Jon T said:

I had this dilemma too. I switched all my own work into Aperture. And then wondered what to do with iPhoto.

I hit on a perfect use for it. Having collected many snippets of pictures and "stuff" from the web over the years I all those images into iPhoto. I have four 'Events', called stuff, photography, boats and apple, and it is a great little picture resource for me - completely personal of course. If I ever download other photographers work for example I save it as their own name. I can then know who to contact if ever I have use for it commercially and need to seek them out.

Nathan said:

I have wanted to do this for awhile but there is one thing that keeps me (for now) from comitting... my wife. I insist that all photos end up on my G5 so they stay organized in one place. My wife has her camera and I have my Nikon and iPhone. So this works well because I have multiple backups on the G5 and she can use the photosharing ability to pull copies over to her macbook. Everything is organized and protected.

The part that sucks is when you shoot "family" photos and end up with ones that would be something you would consider "pro" and want it to be in Aperture. It would be much easier to have it all in Aperture especially since it has better controls for fine tunning but the interface is a bit too clunky for someone who is not "into photography". So for now iPhoto is a must in my house but I am hoping to combine it all one day.

Dudley Warner said:

I have also been thinking about moving all my iPhoto images to Aperture. I was in an Apple Store the other day, and the Mac Pro I was looking at was set up with Aperture having all of the events and folders from the iPhoto Library as part of the Aperture Library. I am not sure how to move images over to Aperture from iPhoto in the structure I saw on the Apple Store's Mac Pro.

I would appreciate help with this.

Thanks.

Adrian B said:

I've been thinking about this for a while, but there's one big thing that stops me: movies.

With the integration of a movie mode in compact cameras for years and now in DSLRs I really want my short movie clips to be organised along with my photos. iPhoto does exactly this. It's not a movie editor at all, but it pulls the movies from my memory card and organizes them like any other photo, which is exactly what I want. Unfortunately Aperture can't do this (yet).

Lee McGillivray said:

@ Dudley: I also saw the use of iPhoto events and folders in Aperture at the Apple Store and took a closer look. The images are referenced and stay in the iPhoto library.

I originally used this method when I set up Aperture, but the referencing bacame annoying so I have migrated everything over and used the folders (the browns...not the blues) to organize my stuff at near root level. It works for me. Can't speak for anyone else.

Lee

Xavier Tello said:

I moved everything about a half year ago, to Aperture.

It's easier to have everything there. I don't miss iPhoto. Everything I do personally and with my colleages (they are designers) comes from my Aperture library.

Believe me: You won't never use iPhoto again...

Just one of those things.

Regards

Jim said:

I use aperture for all my own processing and management needs. My kids are starting to get interested in photography, so I enabled iPhoto in their accounts to help them get started.

Leave a comment


Recommended for You

Tag Cloud

Stay Connected