Inside Aperture

Digital Media | Spotlight: Photography | Inside Aperture | Blogs

Noise Reduction and Dfine 2.101


Most of the time I don’t have a lot of noise in my images. Partially that’s because of the cameras I use, and partially it’s because I try to make sure not to underexpose images. I rarely use ISOs higher than 400 (although in some of the very latest cameras, you can use even higher ISOs with levels of noise that are still quite acceptable.) However on occasion I need to combine high ISOs and long exposures - such as when photographing Northern Lights. (I was back in the Arctic last week and was fortunate to witness an extraordinary display. I’ll be announcing a workshop soon for Northern Lights next fall and will show some of the shots.)

Generally I use ISO 800 for Northern Lights unless the lights occur at twilight. Depending on the lens I use and the intensity of the aurora, the exposure may range from 10 seconds to a minute or more. That means there’s noise in places - especially if I lighten any areas. As I indicated in a blog awhile ago, my favorite noise reduction program has been Imagenomic’s Noiseware Pro. But unfortunately there’s still not an Aperture plug-in version. So I decided to give both Noise Ninja and Dfine 2.0 a try. I’ve heard many people praise Noise Ninja over the years. It’s a very straight forward interface and overall did a reasonable job. What I didn’t like was the fact that I had no way to control where the noise reduction was applied. Sometimes you want more noise reduction in some areas and less in others and that’s not an option.

Nik Software’s Dfine 2.0 - which has just now been upgraded to version 2.101 - is also very straightforward. The program measures the noise in the image automatically or you can manually specify different points to measure. The next step is to apply the noise reduction. You can apply it to the entire image, limit it to certain color ranges, or apply it selectively via U-point technology control points. Learning to use the control points is very easy. You click where you want to place a point and drag sliders to control the size of the area affected, color noise and contrast noise. Some people think that since the size slider is indicated with a circle, that the noise reduction is applied only in circles. In fact it’s applied to areas with similar tonalities and color - which is evident if you switch to the Modes drop down menu and choose to view the mask. You can readily apply more noise reduction in one area of your image than another.

One of the other convenient features of Dfine 2.0 is the ability to batch process images in Aperture. You select however many images you want to apply noise reduction to and go to Edit With >Dfine 2.). You’ll see a single image at a time, but without leaving the interface you can scroll through each of the images. If you save a profile you can apply it automatically or you can use custom settings for each image. When you click Save All, you’ll see a second version of each image in Aperture - with the noise reduction applied.

Nik has a series of short tutorials on each of the features that are worth watching. You'll learn a few tricks for various ways of comparing before and after views as well as how best to use each tool.

Although Aperture does have noise reduction tools, both in the Raw Fine Tuning dialog and the Noise Reduction brick - I personally find that the plug-ins are easier to use and are more effective. Nik software packages the Aperture version and the Photoshop version together. (I know some people wish they’d package their products differently, but that’s how they do it, at least for now.) The Photoshop version has an additional feature - the Selective Tool - that enables you to brush filter effects onto your image by using any of the brush tools in Photoshop (or Elements.) They automatically create layers and layer masks. That can be another very intuitive way of selectively applying noise reduction.

All in all when I want to stay within Aperture, for now, I prefer Dfine 2.0 to Noise Ninja because of the additional control it offers.





AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Comments (2)

2 Comments

Patrick said:

Hey Ellen,
we seem to be in sync on software trials ;-)

I agree with you. I bought NN when it came out but I can't say I'm super impressed. I'm now at the end of the DFine demo trial period and I think I'll be authorizing it the next time I need noise reduction (which isn't that often for me either).

I just used it for an album cover project I'm working on where I had to shoot around ISO 500 on location - not that bad for a D300 but because of the type of post-processing I needed to apply, some noise became apparent. I did side by side comparisons with NN and had much better results with DFine. I hope I'll still find situations where NN is better if only to justify the purchase...

David Medina said:

I have been a long user of Noise Ninja, that is, until I try Nik Dfine. I like Nik Dfine much better because I have more and easier to use controls. The use of control point in DFine is awesome.

With the integration of Nik and OnOne software plugins directly into Aperture makes it an even more powerful tool.

On the subject of plugins, I recently heard the OnOne product manager talk about Aperture Plugins ways vs. Lightroom. He clearly demonstrated the advantages of Aperture method to integrating plugins.

He said that Aperture had a real plugin arquitecture while Lightroom did not. In order for their plugins to work in Lightroom, the user has to have Photoshop because what they do is roundtrip to PS and use the plugin there. They are doing it seamless to the user.

For as much as LR users have brag about the non-destructive nature of the new dodge/burn tools, the reality is that all the plugins will be "destructive" having to create a new psd or tif file, just as Aperture.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Recommended for You

Tag Cloud

Stay Connected