Digital Media | Spotlight: Photography | Inside Aperture | Blogs
Go Wide Young Man
I just got back from Rwanda where I was playing with my new Nikon D300 and 14-24mm lens. There’s something invigorating about getting a new piece of equipment you’re excited about, and I couldn’t wait to put the new tools into action.
I really like the camera, though after using a D2X, I know that the D3 would feel more familiar. But I like the smaller size of the D300, and the 14-24mm f2.8 zoom is just plain fun to work with.
The huge protruding front element on the ultra-wide zoom won't allow a filter to protect it, which did make me a little uncomfortable. Afterall, it's an expensive piece of glass and when something is so new, you want to make sure it stays that way.
I always would have a protective UV filter on the front of my lenses, but about a year and a half ago, I took the filter off my 17-55mm f2.8 lens. Why not? Life's too short, and just like my Grandma eventually peeled the protective plastic off her couch after 20 years, I figured these are just tools, so why not squeeze every pixel of quality out of the optics. Even a B&W filter is still an extra piece of glass between the lens and the sensor.
But after careful evaluation, I really didn't see any difference between my naked lens and one protected with the UV glass. So I decided that I would keep a filter on any new lens acquisitions. Except the 14-24 that is, which shows off it's beautiful front element with a Robert DiNiro scowl, “You wanna scratch me?”
Go ahead, scratch my front element.
So it’s the only lens I keep a lens cap on. When I'm out shooting I like to be ready to pull the camera out of the bag/holster and start shooting immediately, so I never keep lenscaps on lenses; until now.
I've been a Nikon shooter for a very long time, and the last time I got this excited about a lens was when I got my 18mm f4, which I remember quite fondly. There’s a feeling of intimacy I feel shooting wide gives, but you need to use it carefully, and I always try and keep the front element as perpendicular as I can to the ground to minimize distortion. The effective range on this lens is about 21mm-36mm, which is perfect for the kind of work I was doing.
I moved in really tight, and the distortion is minimal in my opinion. The measuring stick for me is that I don’t want the first thing the viewer of my image to think is “wow, that’s a wide angle lens that took that”. I want the viewer to see the content.
I’ve included a few images here for you to see. Note the one shot at 3200 ISO. Nikon shooters can now shoot in low available light! I know the D3 is even better in no light, but I was really impressed with the D300. I think this is the beginning of a beautiful relationship.
Oh yeah, this is an Aperture Blog. This was my first trip that I left Aperture behind. Not that I wanted to, but it does not yet support the RAW files from these new Nikons. I was hoping support would be coming any day, but it did not.
So I re-introduced myself to CS3 Raw and Photo Mechanic. Aperture: Having a great time. Wish you were here. More later.
3200 ISO!
Comments (6)

Steve - very nice photos. Did you do any noise reduction on the 3200 ISO image?
Thanks, no, not at all. Of course it's tough to get the real noise picture from a 500px 72dpi image, but it's very good.
3200 or not... how wonderful is that image, look forward to seeing more
These are great photos. I'm impressed by the ISO3200 performance. It's pretty good on my Canon 40D, but in shadows and especially at night it's still quite noisy. Aperture doesn't seem to do a very good job of noise reduction. Any reduction is nullified by the softness that gets introduced. Or perhaps I'm just using the sliders wrong?
Steve, great post and great photos.
Great images!